nguyenw7的部落格

Marx aforesaid mysticism is opium, Dawkins ("The God Delusion (TGD)" )argued that God is a mental state. The argument on TGD has been enormously heated, to get numerous idea, publication The Huffington Post for a rundown of Dawkins' lines and active 580 annotations running intersectant 24 pages.

Most discussions are related to Christianity, what about Buddhism?

Buddhism is regarded as Pantheistic, and sometimes agnostic, so the clangoring next to Dawkins is not supposed to be as finely tuned.

First state of affairs to note, however, is that here are many an schools of Buddhism, beside extraordinarily varied views in the region of God.

Theravada (or doctrine of the Elders) is conspicuously agnostic, and refuses to go into rational arguments just about belongings not here and now. It focuses on the cleanup of the mind, which if achieved, could bequeath answers to the catchy questions. Discussing it now once our minds are untouched of be bothered viruses is useless.

It is told that the liberal arts Buddha, an so-so person, said that he can solitary constituent the way, every person of necessity to pace their own paths.

This is dissimilar from Stephen Jay Gould's 'NOMA' - 'non-overlapping magisteria'. Gould claimed that field of study and literal faith never come through into combat because they be alive in categorically break up dimensions of discourse.

Other schools of Buddhism feel in absolute Gods and Goddesses, specified as bodhisattvas, who have vowed to facilitate all sentient state to be boundless. Such boddhisattvas are idolized for their superpowers. These schools would be at loggerheads with Dawkins.

Other schools suppose in Buddha-nature, or in Sunyata (Emptiness), which is more than a few genus of Pantheism, associated to what Spinoza and Einstein believed.

"Buddhism has the characteristics of what would be predicted in a cosmic theology for the future: It transcends a personal God, avoids dogmas and theology; it covers both the crude and the spiritual, and it is based on a pious suffer aspirant from the undertake of all things, natural and spiritual, as a shrewd consistency." Albert Einstein

Is Buddhism a meme?

Going more to Dawkins sooner occupation "The Selfish Gene", where on earth he introduced the permanent status acculturation as a component of taste transmission, we may ask if Buddhism is a culture. Dawkins same that religions or ceremonial practices and rituals are complexes of memes or memplexes. Some of the Buddhist rituals are plainly memes, but it is interesting to comprehend Susan Blackmore, the essayist of "The Meme Machine" around meditation:

"if a meditational convention such as as Buddhism is a meme, after it is if truth be told a really unusual one - a meme-clearing acculturation."

Meditation is a bit to be sensitive of the viruses in our mind, together with religions.

The self psychotic belief Finally, the intermediate tenet of Buddhism is the no self doctrine: no self, no soul, no incarnation. It regards the Self Delusion as a markedly vital difficulty than the God psychotic belief. I contemplate if Dawkins would respect self as a delusion.